Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koester, Missouri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Koester, Missouri

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNIS gives it a census code of U6, which is saved for places that don't have legal recognition, it seems. [1]. A place needs to have legal recognition to pass WP:GEOLAND. The topos generally only show a small handful of buildings and a spring. My application for newspapers.com access at WP:LIBRARY hasn't been processed yet, but Google books is almost entirely bringing up just people with this last name. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep valid stub about a rural trading point.72.49.7.25 (talk) 04:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a community. Does not meet minimum requirements for notability. Glendoremus (talk) 23:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do have newspapers.com. Here is an old article about the community, describing several mills and a grocery store. I'm not sure but it seems to be the same community as Koester Springs. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 00:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.